🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.